The Cost-Effectiveness of Computer-Assisted Compared with Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Payer's Perspective.

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence showing that computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with better outcomes compared with conventional TKA for patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis has not been included in economic evaluations of computer-assisted TKA, which are needed to support coverage decisions. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of computer-assisted TKA from a payer's perspective, incorporating recent evidence. METHODS: We compared computer-assisted TKA with conventional TKA with regard to costs (in 2022 U.S. dollars) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) using Markov models for elderly patients (≥65 years of age) and patients who were not elderly (55 to 64 years of age). Costs and QALYs were estimated in the lifetime for elderly patients and in the short term for patients who were not elderly, under a bundled payment program and a Fee-for-Service program. Transition probabilities, costs, and QALYs were retrieved from the literature, a national knee arthroplasty registry, and the National Center for Health Statistics. Threshold and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine the robustness of key estimates used in the base-case analysis. Using projected estimates of TKA utilization, the total cost savings of performing computer-assisted TKA rather than conventional TKA were estimated. RESULTS: Compared with conventional TKA, computer-assisted TKA was associated with higher QALYs and lower costs for both elderly patients and patients who were not elderly, regardless of payment programs, making computer-assisted TKA a favorable treatment option. Widespread adoption of computer-assisted TKA in all U.S. patients would result in an estimated total cost saving of $1 billion for payers. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with conventional TKA, computer-assisted TKA reduces costs to payers while providing favorable outcomes. Payers may consider providing additional payment incentives to providers for performing computer-assisted TKA, to achieve outcome improvement and cost control by facilitating widespread adoption of computer-assisted TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic and Decision Analysis Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Using the Stratum-Specific Likelihood Ratio Method to Derive Outcome-Based Hospital Volume Categories for Total Knee Replacement.

BACKGROUND: Evidence of higher hospital volume being associated with improved outcomes for patients undergoing total knee replacement (TKR) is mostly based on arbitrary distribution-based thresholds. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to define outcome-based volume thresholds using data from a national database. METHODS: We used the MedPAR Limited Data Set inpatient data from 2010-2015 to identify patients who had undergone primary TKR. Surgical and TKR specific complications occurring within the index hospitalization and all-cause readmission within 90 days were considered adverse events. We derived an average annual TKR case volume for each hospital and applied the stratum-specific likelihood ratio method to determine volume categories indicative of a similar likelihood of 90-day post-operative complications. Hierarchical multivariable logistic regression with a random intercept for hospital nested within study year and adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics was performed to determine if these volume thresholds were still associated with the odds of 90-day readmission for complications after adjustment. RESULTS: SSLR analysis yielded 4 hospital volume categories based on the likelihood of 90-day postoperative complications: 1-31 (low), 32-127 (medium), 128-248 (high), and 429+ (very high) TKRs performed per year. The results of the hierarchical multivariable logistic regression showed significantly increased odds of 90-day complications at lower volume categories. Sensitivity analyses confirmed our main findings. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to provide national-level volume categories that are evidence-based. Publicizing these thresholds may enhance quality measures available to patients, providers, and payors.

Step cadence as a novel objective postoperative recovery metric in children who undergo laparoscopic appendectomy.

BACKGROUND: Daily step counts from consumer wearable devices have been used to objectively assess postsurgical recovery in children. However, step cadence, defined as steps taken per minute, may be a more specific measure of physiologic status. The purpose of this study is to define objective normative physical activity recovery trajectories after laparoscopic appendectomy using this novel metric. We hypothesized that patients would have a progressive increase in peak cadence until reaching a plateau representing baseline status, and this would occur earlier for simple compared with complicated appendicitis. METHODS: Children aged 3 to 18 years were enrolled after laparoscopic appendectomy for simple or complicated appendicitis between March 2019 and December 2022 at a tertiary children's hospital. Participants wore a Fitbit for 21 postoperative days. The peak 1-minute cadence and peak 30-minute cadence were determined each postoperative day. Piecewise linear regression was conducted to generate normative peak step cadence recovery trajectories for simple and complicated appendicitis. RESULTS: A total of 147 children met criteria (53.7% complicated appendicitis). Patients with simple appendicitis reached plateau postoperative day 10 at a mean peak 1-minute cadence of 111 steps/minute and a mean peak 30-minute cadence of 77 steps/minute. The complicated appendicitis recovery trajectory reached a plateau postoperative day 13 at a mean peak 1-minute cadence of 106 steps/minute and postoperative day 15 at a mean peak 30-minute cadence of 75 steps/minute. CONCLUSION: Using step cadence, we defined procedure-specific normative peak cadence recovery trajectories after laparoscopic appendectomy. This can empower clinicians to set data-driven expectations for recovery after surgery and establish the groundwork for consumer wearable devices as a post-discharge remote monitoring tool.

Intercostal Nerve Cryoablation Reduces Opioid Use and Length of Stay Without Increasing Adverse Events: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 5442 Patients Undergoing Surgical Correction of Pectus Excavatum.

OBJECTIVE: To examine differences in opioid use, length of stay, and adverse events after minimally invasive correction of pectus excavatum (MIRPE) with and without intercostal nerve cryoablation. BACKGROUND: Small studies show that intraoperative intercostal nerve cryoablation provides effective analgesia with no large-scale evaluations of this technique. METHODS: The pediatric health information system database was used to perform a retrospective cohort study comparing patients undergoing MIRPE at children's hospitals before and after the initiation of cryoablation. The association of cryoablation use with inpatient opioid use was determined using quantile regression with robust standard errors. Difference in risk-adjusted length of stay between the cohorts was estimated using negative binomial regression. Odds of adverse events between the two cohorts were compared using logistic regression with a generalized estimating equation. RESULTS: A total of 5442 patients underwent MIRPE at 44 children's hospitals between 2016 and 2022 with 1592 patients treated after cryoablation was introduced at their hospital. Cryoablation use was associated with a median decrease of 80.8 (95% CI: 68.6-93.0) total oral morphine equivalents as well as a decrease in estimated median length of stay from 3.5 [3.2-3.9] days to 2.5 [2.2-2.9] days ( P value: 0.016). Cryoablation use was not significantly associated with an increase in any studied adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of cryoablation for perioperative analgesia was associated with decreased inpatient opioid use and length of stay in a large sample with no change in adverse events. This novel modality for perioperative analgesia offers a promising alternative to traditional pain management in thoracic surgery.

2023 American College of Rheumatology and American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Clinical Practice Guideline for the Optimal Timing of Elective Hip or Knee Arthroplasty for Patients With Symptomatic Moderate-to-Severe Osteoarthritis or Advanced Symptomatic Osteonecrosis With Secondary Arthritis for Whom Nonoperative Therapy Is Ineffective.

OBJECTIVE: To develop evidence-based consensus recommendations for the optimal timing of hip and knee arthroplasty to improve patient-important outcomes including, but not limited to, pain, function, infection, hospitalization, and death at 1 year for patients with symptomatic and radiographic moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis or advanced symptomatic osteonecrosis with secondary arthritis of the hip or knee who have previously attempted nonoperative therapy, and for whom nonoperative therapy was ineffective, and who have chosen to undergo elective hip or knee arthroplasty (collectively referred to as TJA). METHODS: We developed 13 clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, outcomes (PICO) questions. After a systematic literature review, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to rate the quality of evidence (high, moderate, low, or very low), and evidence tables were created. A Voting Panel, including 13 physicians and patients, discussed the PICO questions until consensus was achieved on the direction (for/against) and strength (strong/conditional) of the recommendations. RESULTS: The panel conditionally recommended against delaying TJA to pursue additional nonoperative treatment including physical therapy, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, ambulatory aids, and intraarticular injections. It conditionally recommended delaying TJA for nicotine reduction or cessation. The panel conditionally recommended delay for better glycemic control for patients who have diabetes mellitus, although no specific measure or level was identified. There was consensus that obesity by itself was not a reason for delay, but that weight loss should be strongly encouraged, and the increase in operative risk should be discussed. The panel conditionally recommended against delay in patients who have severe deformity or bone loss, or in patients who have a neuropathic joint. Evidence for all recommendations was graded as low or very low quality. CONCLUSION: This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations regarding the optimal timing of TJA in patients who have symptomatic and radiographic moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis or advanced symptomatic osteonecrosis with secondary arthritis for whom nonoperative therapy was ineffective to improve patient-important outcomes, including pain, function, infection, hospitalization, and death at 1 year. We acknowledge that the evidence is of low quality primarily due to indirectness and hope future research will allow for further refinement of the recommendations.

2023 American College of Rheumatology and American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Clinical Practice Guideline for the Optimal Timing of Elective Hip or Knee Arthroplasty for Patients With Symptomatic Moderate-to-Severe Osteoarthritis or Advanced Symptomatic Osteonecrosis With Secondary Arthritis for Whom Nonoperative Therapy Is Ineffective.

OBJECTIVE: To develop evidence-based consensus recommendations for the optimal timing of hip and knee arthroplasty to improve patient-important outcomes including, but not limited to, pain, function, infection, hospitalization, and death at 1 year for patients with symptomatic and radiographic moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis or advanced symptomatic osteonecrosis with secondary arthritis of the hip or knee who have previously attempted nonoperative therapy, and for whom nonoperative therapy was ineffective, and who have chosen to undergo elective hip or knee arthroplasty (collectively referred to as TJA). METHODS: We developed 13 clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, outcomes (PICO) questions. After a systematic literature review, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to rate the quality of evidence (high, moderate, low, or very low), and evidence tables were created. A Voting Panel, including 13 physicians and patients, discussed the PICO questions until consensus was achieved on the direction (for/against) and strength (strong/conditional) of the recommendations. RESULTS: The panel conditionally recommended against delaying TJA to pursue additional nonoperative treatment including physical therapy, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, ambulatory aids, and intraarticular injections. It conditionally recommended delaying TJA for nicotine reduction or cessation. The panel conditionally recommended delay for better glycemic control for patients who have diabetes mellitus, although no specific measure or level was identified. There was consensus that obesity by itself was not a reason for delay, but that weight loss should be strongly encouraged, and the increase in operative risk should be discussed. The panel conditionally recommended against delay in patients who have severe deformity or bone loss, or in patients who have a neuropathic joint. Evidence for all recommendations was graded as low or very low quality. CONCLUSION: This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations regarding the optimal timing of TJA in patients who have symptomatic and radiographic moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis or advanced symptomatic osteonecrosis with secondary arthritis for whom nonoperative therapy was ineffective to improve patient-important outcomes, including pain, function, infection, hospitalization, and death at 1 year. We acknowledge that the evidence is of low quality primarily due to indirectness and hope future research will allow for further refinement of the recommendations.

2023 American College of Rheumatology and American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Clinical Practice Guideline for the Optimal Timing of Elective Hip or Knee Arthroplasty for Patients With Symptomatic Moderate-to-Severe Osteoarthritis or Advanced Symptomatic Osteonecrosis With Secondary Arthritis for Whom Nonoperative Therapy Is Ineffective.

OBJECTIVE: To develop evidence-based consensus recommendations for the optimal timing of hip and knee arthroplasty to improve patient-important outcomes including, but not limited to, pain, function, infection, hospitalization, and death at 1 year for patients with symptomatic and radiographic moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis or advanced symptomatic osteonecrosis with secondary arthritis of the hip or knee who have previously attempted nonoperative therapy, and for whom nonoperative therapy was ineffective, and who have chosen to undergo elective hip or knee arthroplasty (collectively referred to as TJA). METHODS: We developed 13 clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, outcomes (PICO) questions. After a systematic literature review, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to rate the quality of evidence (high, moderate, low, or very low), and evidence tables were created. A Voting Panel, including 13 physicians and patients, discussed the PICO questions until consensus was achieved on the direction (for/against) and strength (strong/conditional) of the recommendations. RESULTS: The panel conditionally recommended against delaying TJA to pursue additional nonoperative treatment including physical therapy, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, ambulatory aids, and intraarticular injections. It conditionally recommended delaying TJA for nicotine reduction or cessation. The panel conditionally recommended delay for better glycemic control for patients who have diabetes mellitus, although no specific measure or level was identified. There was consensus that obesity by itself was not a reason for delay, but that weight loss should be strongly encouraged, and the increase in operative risk should be discussed. The panel conditionally recommended against delay in patients who have severe deformity or bone loss, or in patients who have a neuropathic joint. Evidence for all recommendations was graded as low or very low quality. CONCLUSION: This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations regarding the optimal timing of TJA in patients who have symptomatic and radiographic moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis or advanced symptomatic osteonecrosis with secondary arthritis for whom nonoperative therapy was ineffective to improve patient-important outcomes, including pain, function, infection, hospitalization, and death at 1 year. We acknowledge that the evidence is of low quality primarily due to indirectness and hope future research will allow for further refinement of the recommendations.

Applying machine learning to consumer wearable data for the early detection of complications after pediatric appendectomy.

When children are discharged from the hospital after surgery, their caregivers often rely on subjective assessments (e.g., appetite, fatigue) to monitor postoperative recovery as objective assessment tools are scarce at home. Such imprecise and one-dimensional evaluations can result in unwarranted emergency department visits or delayed care. To address this gap in postoperative monitoring, we evaluated the ability of a consumer-grade wearable device, Fitbit, which records multimodal data about daily physical activity, heart rate, and sleep, in detecting abnormal recovery early in children recovering after appendectomy. One hundred and sixty-two children, ages 3-17 years old, who underwent an appendectomy (86 complicated and 76 simple cases of appendicitis) wore a Fitbit device on their wrist for 21 days postoperatively. Abnormal recovery events (i.e., abnormal symptoms or confirmed postoperative complications) that arose during this period were gathered from medical records and patient reports. Fitbit-derived measures, as well as demographic and clinical characteristics, were used to train machine learning models to retrospectively detect abnormal recovery in the two days leading up to the event for patients with complicated and simple appendicitis. A balanced random forest classifier accurately detected 83% of these abnormal recovery days in complicated appendicitis and 70% of abnormal recovery days in simple appendicitis prior to the true report of a symptom/complication. These results support the development of machine learning algorithms to predict onset of abnormal symptoms and complications in children undergoing surgery, and the use of consumer wearables as monitoring tools for early detection of postoperative events.

Metabolic syndrome and the likelihood of knee pain and functional disability: evidence from a large middle eastern population-based study.

OBJECTIVES: Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) has been associated with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) in animal studies, but epidemiologic evidence of the association remains controversial. We investigated the association between MetS and knee pain and functional disability, the hallmarks of KOA, in a Middle Eastern population with high reported MetS rates. METHODS: A population-based study of adult individuals was conducted between 01/2016 and 03/2019. Data collected included age, sex, blood pressure, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), and comprehensive metabolic panel blood tests. Knee symptoms were assessed using The Western Ontario and McMaster Arthritis index (WOMAC) The Adult Treatment Panel III criteria was applied to determine if participants had MetS. Multivariable regression was used to determine the association of MetS, and its components, with the WOMAC total and subscale scores. RESULTS: Of 6,000 participants enrolled, 15.5% had MetS. The multivariate regression demonstrated that participants with MetS had significantly higher WOMAC total and subscale scores after adjusting for demographic variables; however, these associations were not significant after adjusting for BMI. Multivariate regression examining the association between MetS components and the WOMAC scores showed sex-based significant differences with WOMAC scores; however, the differences were not larger than the minimally clinical important differences. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that after adjustment for BMI, neither MetS nor its individual parameters were associated with worse knee symptoms. As such, the association between MetS and worse knee symptoms requires further study.

Clinicians' perspectives on wearable sensor technology as an alternative bedside monitoring tool in two West African countries.

OBJECTIVE: Healthcare facilities in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), especially in Africa, suffer from a lack of continuous bedside monitoring capability, adversely affecting timely detection of hemodynamic deterioration and the opportunity for life-saving intervention. Wearable device technologies can overcome many of the challenges of conventional bedside monitors and could be viable alternatives. We assessed clinicians' perspectives on the use of a novel experimental wearable device ("biosensor") to improve bedside monitoring of pediatric patients in two West African LMICs. METHODS: Focus groups were conducted in 3 hospitals (2 in Ghana and 1 in Liberia), in both urban and rural settings and of variable size, to elucidate clinicians' attitudes about the biosensor and to identify potential implementation needs. The focus group sessions were coded using a constant comparative method. Deductive thematic analysis was applied to pair themes with Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) contextual factors and domains. RESULTS: Four focus groups were conducted in October 2019, and included 9 physicians, 20 nurses, and 20 community health workers. Fifty-two codes in four thematic areas were linked to 3 CFIR contextual factors and 9 domains. Key themes were durability and cost of the biosensor, hospital setting, and staffing concerns, which were related to the "Inner Setting" and "Characteristics of the Intervention" CFIR contextual factors. Participants, who recognized the limitations of current vital sign monitoring systems, further identified 21 clinical settings in which a biosensor could potentially be useful and expressed willingness to implement the biosensor. CONCLUSION: Clinicians who provide care to pediatric patients in two West African LMICs suggested multiple uses of a novel experimental wearable biosensor and expressed willingness to use it for continuous bedside vital sign monitoring. They identified device design (e.g., durability, cost), hospital setting (rural vs urban), and staffing as important factors to consider during further development and implementation.

Discordance between Subjective and Objective Assessments of Activity after Pediatric Appendectomy.

BACKGROUND: Physical activity recovery after pediatric surgery can be assessed using objective measures such as step counts, but practice currently relies on subjective assessment by proxy. It is unclear how subjective and objective assessments of activity relate. We compared caregiver assessment of return to normal physical activity after pediatric appendectomy to step count recovery measured by a Fitbit. METHODS: Pediatric patients who underwent appendectomy were recruited between 2020 and 2022 to be monitored for 21 d with a Fitbit. Patients were grouped by the postoperative day (POD) (7, 14, or 21) their caregiver first reported their activity was "back to normal." Objective return to normal step count was estimated for each group by modeling the inflection point from increasing steps to a plateau. These measures were determined discordant if the subjective report remained outside the modeled 95% confidence interval (CI) for the day the group plateaued. RESULTS: Thirty-nine simple appendicitis and 40 complicated appendicitis patients were recruited. Among simple appendicitis patients, daily steps plateaued on POD 10.8 (95% CI 7.4-14.3), POD 14.0 (95% CI 11.0-17.1), and POD 11.1 (95% CI 6.9-15.3) for the day 7, day 14, and day 21 groups, respectively. Complicated appendicitis groups plateaued on POD 12.8 (95% CI 8.7-16.9), POD 15.2 (95% CI 11.1-19.3), and POD 16.7 (95% CI 12.3-21.0), respectively. Significant discordance was observed between subjective and objective assessments for the day 7 and day 14 simple groups and for the day 7 complicated group. CONCLUSIONS: There was significant discordance between caregiver and accelerometer-assessed activity recovery after pediatric surgery. Development of objective measures of recovery could help standardize assessment of children's recovery after surgery.

Incorporating Expected Outcomes Into Clinical Decision-Making for Total Knee Arthroplasty.

OBJECTIVE: Expected outcomes (e.g., expected survivorship after a cancer treatment) have improved decision-making around treatment options in many clinical fields. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of expected values of 3 widely available total knee arthroplasty (TKA) outcomes (risk of serious complications, time to revision, and improvement in pain and function at 2 years after surgery) on clinical recommendation of TKA. METHODS: The RAND/University of California Los Angeles appropriateness criteria method was used to evaluate the role of the 3 expected outcomes in clinical recommendation of TKA. The expected outcomes were added to 5 established preoperative factors from the modified Escobar appropriateness criteria. The 8 indication factors were used to develop 279 clinical scenarios, and a panel of 9 clinicians rated the appropriateness of TKA for each scenario as inappropriate, inconclusive, and appropriate. Classification tree analysis was applied to these ratings to identify the most influential of the 8 factors in discriminating TKA appropriateness classifications. RESULTS: Ratings for the 279 appropriateness scenarios deemed 34.4% of the scenarios as appropriate, 40.1% as inconclusive, and 25.5% as inappropriate. Classification tree analyses showed that expected improvement in pain and function and expected time to revision were the most influential factors that discriminated among the TKA appropriateness classification categories. CONCLUSION: Our results showed that clinicians would use expected postoperative outcome factors in determining appropriateness for TKA. These results call for further work in this area to incorporate estimates of expected pain/function and revision outcomes into clinical practice to improve decision-making for TKA.

Is there variation in utilization of preoperative tests among patients undergoing total hip and knee replacement in the US, and does it affect outcomes? A population-based analysis.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To describe recent practice patterns of preoperative tests and to examine their association with 90-day all-cause readmissions and length of stay. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS). SETTING: SPARCS from March 1, 2016, to July 1, 2017. PARTICIPANTS: Adults undergoing Total Hip Replacement (THR) or Total Knee Replacement (TKR) had a preoperative screening outpatient visit within two months before their surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Electrocardiogram (EKG), chest X-ray, and seven preoperative laboratory tests (RBCs antibody screen, Prothrombin time (PT) and Thromboplastin time, Metabolic Panel, Complete Blood Count (CBC), Methicillin Resistance Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) Nasal DNA probe, Urinalysis, Urine culture) were identified. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Regression analyses were utilized to determine the association between each preoperative test and two postoperative outcomes (90-day all-cause readmission and length of stay). Regression models adjusted for hospital-level random effects, patient demographics, insurance, hospital TKR, THR surgical volume, and comorbidities. Sensitivity analysis was conducted using the subset of patients with no comorbidities. RESULTS: Fifty-five thousand ninety-nine patients (60% Female, mean age 66.1+/- 9.8 SD) were included. The most common tests were metabolic panel (74.5%), CBC (66.8%), and RBC antibody screen (58.8%). The least common tests were MRSA Nasal DNA probe (13.0%), EKG (11.7%), urine culture (10.7%), and chest X-ray (7.9%). Carrying out MRSA testing, urine culture, and EKG was associated with a lower likelihood of 90-day all-cause readmissions. The length of hospital stay was not associated with carrying out any preoperative tests. Results were similar in the subset with no comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Wide variation exists in preoperative tests before THR and TKR. We identified three preoperative tests that may play a role in reducing readmissions. Further investigation is needed to evaluate these findings using more granular clinical data.

Cost-effectiveness of Early Screening Home Semen Analysis in Couples Attempting to Conceive.

OBJECTIVE: To study the cost-effectiveness of incorporating home semen analysis in screening for oligospermia and expediting time to evaluation. METHODS: A decision analytic model was built using inputs from the medical literature. The index patient is the male partner in a couple seeking fertility, and entry into the model was assumed to be at the inception of the couple's attempts to conceive via natural means. Three main strategies are described and analyzed: (1) baseline strategy of no testing, (2) utilization of a home semen testing kit, (3) universal testing via a clinic visit and gold standard lab semen analysis. The primary outcome was detection of oligospermia (defined as sperm concentration <15 million/mL). Strategies were ranked by months to evaluation by a male infertility specialist saved. Costs were considered from the patient perspective and were incorporated to determine the incremental cost per month saved to evaluation (ICMS) per 100,000 patients. RESULTS: Compared to a baseline strategy of no screening, utilizing a home test would save 89,000 months at the incremental cost of $7,418,000 for an ICMS of $45.51. Shifting to a strategy of universal gold standard clinic and lab testing saves an additional 3000 months but at an ICMS of $17,691 compared to the home testing strategy. CONCLUSION: Widespread adoption and the early usage of home semen analysis may be a cost-effective method of screening for oligospermia and facilitating further evaluation with an andrology specialist.

Revisiting Short-term Outcomes of Conventional and Computer-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Population-based Study.

BACKGROUND: Population-based studies showing the advantage of computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty (CATKA) over conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are outdated. More recent institution-based studies with relatively small sample sizes may hinder wider adoption. This cohort-based study aimed to compare postoperative CATKA and TKA in-hospital complications and 90-day all-cause readmissions using 2017-2018 data. METHODS: Patients who underwent a primary unilateral CATKA or TKA were identified in the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database. In-hospital complications were defined based on the 2020 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services total hip arthroplasty and TKA complications measure. Ninety-day readmissions were identified using unique patient identifiers. Logistic regression with a generalized estimating equation was used to assess associations of computer assistance with in-hospital complications and 90-day all-cause readmissions. RESULTS: A total of 80,468 TKAs were identified during the study period, of which 7,395 (9.2%) were CATKAs. Significantly fewer complications occurred among patients who had CATKAs compared with conventional TKAs (0.4% of total CATKAs vs 2.6% of total conventional TKAs, P < 0.001); patients who had CATKAs had fewer 90-day all-cause readmissions compared with those who underwent TKAs (363 vs 4,169 revisits, P < 0.01). Computer assistance was associated with significantly lower odds of in-hospital complications (odds ratio, 0.15, 95% confidence interval, 0.09 to 0.24; P < 0.05) but not 90-day all-cause readmissions. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing CATKAs had markedly lower odds of in-hospital complications, compared with patients having TKAs, which has implications for both patient outcomes and hospital reimbursement. These more recent cohort-based findings encourage wider CATKA adoption.